Christian Fellowship Forum

     Go!
Prospero Blocks


 

Chat Center

Christians in 2006
Topic: Solutions for the new Century

Board Folders

The Fellowship Hall: 37401 msgs in 1632 dscns, Latest: 10:25 PMThe Fellowship...
37401 msgs in 1632 dscns
Latest: 10:25 PM
Christian Morals: 11587 msgs in 313 dscns, Latest: 10:38 AMChristian Morals
11587 msgs in 313 dscns
Latest: 10:38 AM
Family Life: 3353 msgs in 177 dscns, Latest: Oct-1 Family Life
3353 msgs in 177 dscns
Latest: Oct-1
Prayer: 5705 msgs in 401 dscns, Latest: Nov-19 Prayer
5705 msgs in 401 dscns
Latest: Nov-19
Bible Study & Discipleship: 35365 msgs in 659 dscns, Latest: 8:39 PMBible Study ...
35365 msgs in 659 dscns
Latest: 8:39 PM
Worship & the Arts: 1933 msgs in 141 dscns, Latest: Oct-19 Worship & the ...
1933 msgs in 141 dscns
Latest: Oct-19
Reading & Listening Room: 1747 msgs in 153 dscns, Latest: Nov-19 Reading & List...
1747 msgs in 153 dscns
Latest: Nov-19
Health & Wellness: 1379 msgs in 109 dscns, Latest: Nov-4 Health & Wellness
1379 msgs in 109 dscns
Latest: Nov-4
Mission & Ministry: 1359 msgs in 106 dscns, Latest: Nov-14 Mission & Mini...
1359 msgs in 106 dscns
Latest: Nov-14
Church/Parish Resources: 237 msgs in 20 dscns, Latest: Nov-1 Church/Parish ...
237 msgs in 20 dscns
Latest: Nov-1
The Last Days: 5714 msgs in 177 dscns, Latest: Nov-14 The Last Days
5714 msgs in 177 dscns
Latest: Nov-14
Christian Writers/Bloggers: 1528 msgs in 135 dscns, Latest: Oct-12 Christian Writ...
1528 msgs in 135 dscns
Latest: Oct-12
Contentious Brethren: 40411 msgs in 523 dscns, Latest: 11:14 PMContentious Br...
40411 msgs in 523 dscns
Latest: 11:14 PM
Public Affairs: 5324 msgs in 269 dscns, Latest: 4:04 PMPublic Affairs
5324 msgs in 269 dscns
Latest: 4:04 PM
Message Area
Contentious Brethren

More about Seventh Day Adventists

 Subscribe SubscribeGet a printer-friendly version of this discussion Print Discussion 

#51 of 90

     Posted 7/24/07 8:28 PM   
gsneed8
 
From  gsneed8  Posts 88  Last 8/15/07
To  Harold      [Msg # 117184.51 Message 117184.51 replying to 117184.50 117184.50 ]    

Exactly the same thing it tells you. "For by grace are ye saved
through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God.."
But, have you bothered to read anything else in your Bible? Even
verse 5 "Even when we were dead in sins, hath quickened us
together with Christ, (by grace ye are saved;)"
How could you be dead in sins? What is sin????? What about all these
texts:????
1 John 2:3 "And hereby we do know that we know him, if we
keep his commandments. 4 He that saith, I know him, and
keepeth not his commandments, is a liar, and the truth
is not in him. 5 But whoso keepeth his word, in him verily
is the love of God perfected: hereby know we that we are in him."
Romans 6:16 "Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves
servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey;
whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?"

Wow... Harold.. if you would just step back and look at your interpretations of these passages..

How does someone who is 'dead IN sin' make themselves alive?  By being obedient to the law which is impossible for them to complete, nor even having an inclanation to try and complete it? NO!.. God quickens us together with Christ.  Quicken means to make alive - something that we could not do for ourselves, which is why salvation is not by works but all of grace.  Read this clearly - Man is incapable of completing the law... even when you were infused with the Holy Spirit, you still struggle with flesh... you may not openly break the law in action, but you still may do so in thoughts and intentions (even sometimes sinning in ignorance).  So what happens when you are made alive in Christ -

1.) First you see the grossness of sin

2.) You see the holiness of God (thereby making you extremely humble)

3.) You see the gospel of Jesus Christ as personal and finally understand what His death and resuurection mean

4.) You have faith in that gospel (which is a gift also from God) and this completes your justification in His heavenly courts.

5.) You live your life by Him, for Him, and with Him.  All in love...  (Here is where works come in)

6.) You grow in grace and in the knowledge of Christ ...

John specifically says, that if we do what Christ says, 'thereby we know we are in Him', not 'thereby he saves us'...

 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#52 of 90

     Posted 7/25/07 6:41 AM   
restonthe7thday
 
From  restonthe7thday  Posts 296  Last 9/3/08
To  ozspen      [Msg # 117184.52 Message 117184.52 replying to 117184.49 117184.49 ]    

>>fulfil<<

Please fill in the blanks!

Jesus said: "Think not that I come to________the law and the prophets. I am not come to___________,but to___________   Mathew 5:17

Is there not a clear distinction of meaning here between the two word?

 

 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#53 of 90

     Posted 7/25/07 7:49 AM   
ozspen
 
From  ozspen  Posts 4967  Last 4:57 AM
To  restonthe7thday      [Msg # 117184.53 Message 117184.53 replying to 117184.52 117184.52 ]    
Reston...
>>Please fill in the blanks!

Jesus said: "Think not that I come to________the law and the prophets. I am not come to___________,but to___________   Mathew 5:17<<

There is no need for me to fill in any blanks as I have about 12 different English Bible translations on my shelf.  Would you please tell me the difference in meaning between katalusai and plerwsai in this verse?

Sincerely,
Spencer

 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#54 of 90

     Posted 7/25/07 9:18 PM   
restonthe7thday
 
From  restonthe7thday  Posts 296  Last 9/3/08
To  ozspen      [Msg # 117184.54 Message 117184.54 replying to 117184.53 117184.53 ]    

>>I have about 12 different English Bible translations on my shelf.<<

Pretty confident huh? yet a simple change,change & fulfil is beyond you!

I know! I know from your vantage point I am the evil, legalistic, judizing, sunday stomping catholic hating, try to work my way into heaven,poor excuse of a christian, sda!

I know that you see me as the enemy and so your fighting gloves are on!

But if you just took your blinders off you would see what I see!

Revelation says,"...and all the world wondered after the beast!" rev. 13:3

There is only one religion that holds that kind of power and has consistantly held it for the past +1000 years. compare your doctrines with those of the whole bible and see how they stack up! Popular christianity is not the religion of christ!

 

 

 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#55 of 90

     Posted 7/26/07 6:11 AM   
ozspen
 
From  ozspen  Posts 4967  Last 4:57 AM
To  restonthe7thday      [Msg # 117184.55 Message 117184.55 replying to 117184.54 117184.54 ]    
Reston. . .
    I wrote:>>I have about 12 different English Bible translations on my shelf.<<

You responded: << Pretty confident huh? yet a simple change,change & fulfil is beyond you!>>

I have no idea to what y ou are referring.  Would you please explain.

<<I know! I know from your vantage point I am the evil, legalistic, judizing, sunday stomping catholic hating, try to work my way into heaven,poor excuse of a christian, sda!>>

This is a false statement.  I do not know you apart from your posts and I have never ever on this forum many this kind of statement towards you.  Never!

>>I know that you see me as the enemy and so your fighting gloves are on!>>

Please give up the persecution complex.  I most certainly do not regard you as an enemy whom I am fighting with "fighting gloves" (whatever that means).  I see you as promoting false doctrine, based on the Bible, and I am trying to have a Bible discussion with you.

>>But if you just took your blinders off you would see what I see!  Revelation says,"...and all the world wondered after the beast!" rev. 13:3<<

So do you regard me as a follower of the beast of Rev. 13:3?

>>There is only one religion that holds that kind of power and has consistantly held it for the past +1000 years. compare your doctrines with those of the whole bible and see how they stack up! Popular christianity is not the religion of christ!<<

I'm a Bible-believing, evangelical Christian who accepts the Bible as the inerrant Word of God.  I only debate with you based on my understanding of the Bible that is without error in the original manuscripts.

Would you please quit making false allegations about my faith and me?

Sincerely,
Spencer

 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#56 of 90

     Posted 7/26/07 10:08 AM   
Harold
 
From  Harold  Posts 10535  Last 2:18 PM
To  ozspen      [Msg # 117184.56 Message 117184.56 replying to 117184.55 117184.55 ]    

>> I see you as promoting false doctrine, based on the Bible, >>

Sorry to step in, but this statement just cound't be passed.
What 'false' doctrine' do we promote, based on the Bible? I didn't
know that there could be any such thing. All of our doctrines are
based on the Bible. I am sorry to say that this is more than you
can say about all of your doctrines. I'll name two.
The immortality of the soul
The sacredness of Sunday.
Try as you might, you can not find any support for either of those
in any Bible.

Harold.

 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#57 of 90

     Posted 7/26/07 4:40 PM   
ozspen
 
From  ozspen  Posts 4967  Last 4:57 AM
To  Harold      [Msg # 117184.57 Message 117184.57 replying to 117184.56 117184.56 ]    

Harold,

>>What 'false' doctrine' do we promote, based on the Bible? I didn't
know that there could be any such thing. All of our doctrines are
based on the Bible. I am sorry to say that this is more than you
can say about all of your doctrines. I'll name two.
The immortality of the soul
The sacredness of Sunday.
Try as you might, you can not find any support for either of those
in any Bible.<<

You and your denomination, like the Jehovah's Witnesses, promote false doctrine based on your interpretation of the Bible (hence my description of your false doctrine "based on the Bible").  That's a fact that these ex-Seventh Day Adventists discovered and have provided teaching on the www that refutes your false doctrines.  

  1. The Sabbath: Common Misunderstandings. For those who want more refutation of your false doctrine of the Sabbath, read "Sabbatarianism Re-Examined."

2.     The State of the Dead.  In this article from The Watchman Expositor, there is a refutation of your false doctrine of soul sleep, in which it is rightly declared: "Adventists, like Jehovah Witnesses, believe in soul sleep and do not believe in hell. Note how they have changed the word of God to fit their theology."

  1. "Are the Gospels and the 1844 Theology Compatible?"  See also Desmond Ford's refutation of your Investigative Judgment false doctrine at: "The Gospel, 1844, and Judgment."
  1. For a testimony of a former SDA, here's "Reflections of a Former Seventh-Day Adventist."
  1. "Disproving Seventh-Day Adventism"
  1. "Christ and not the Law"

 Etc., etc.

Sincerely,
Spencer

 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#58 of 90

     Posted 7/26/07 6:16 PM   
Harold
 
From  Harold  Posts 10535  Last 2:18 PM
To  ozspen      [Msg # 117184.58 Message 117184.58 replying to 117184.57 117184.57 ]    

I don't know why I have to keep saying this, I do not read
fiction. If you want to know what SDAs believe, ask an SDA. If
you want to know what some nuts think, ask them, as I see you
have. Anyone can twist scripture. And you know what He says is
going to happen to anyone who does.

I thought you were smarter than that. What church do you belong
to? Do you doubt that I can find some nuts on this internet that
have lots to say about your church??? Should I believe them???
So, why do you ask the nuts about MY church?? Instesd, why don't
you look up our doctrines in the Bible. That is where they come
from.
Let's start with the immortality of the soul.
l. Gen.2:7 "And the LORD God formed man of the dust of
the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath
of life; and man became a living soul."

Two elements. Dust and breath. Nobody gave Adam a soul. He
just simply became one.

Ezek. 18:4 "Behold, all souls are mine; as the soul of
the father, so also the soul of the son is mine: the
soul that sinneth, it shall die."

So much for that immortal soul.

1 Cor.15:52 "In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye,
at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and
the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall
be changed. 53 For this corruptible must put on
incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality."

Aha. At the LAST TRUMP. Now we get our immortality.

Does any of this get through, or is the filter of the RCC too
strong?

Harold.

 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#59 of 90

     Posted 7/26/07 8:31 PM   
Abideth
 
From  Abideth  Posts 808  Last Nov-18
To  ozspen      [Msg # 117184.59 Message 117184.59 replying to 117184.57 117184.57 ]    

You and your denomination, like the Jehovah's Witnesses, promote false doctrine based on your interpretation of the Bible (hence my description of your false doctrine "based on the Bible").  That's a fact that these ex-Seventh Day Adventists discovered and have provided teaching on the www that refutes your false doctrines. <<<<

Hi Spencer, Here is a excerpt from an article written by  Dale Ratzlaff, a former SDA who refutes the Investigative Judgment.  This certainly supports your comment on the false doctrines of the SDA and others as you will see in the following:

"Since leaving Adventism I have made two profound conclusions. Some readers may find these very offensive, but I believe they are nevertheless patently true and are of utmost importance, and that is why I share them here:
One cannot understand the Bible correctly when continuing to read the writings of Ellen White. While an Adventist I would have reacted passionately to this statement as some readers may now be doing! The concept is more easily acceptable, however, if applied to other religious groups. No Mormon will be able to understand the Bible correctly while continuing to read Joseph Smith’s The Pearl of Great Price and Doctrine and Covenants. No member of the Christian Science Church will be able to understand the Bible correctly while continuing to read Mary Baker Eddy’s Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures. No Jehovah’s Witness will understand the Bible correctly while continuing to read the Watchtower. All these groups would argue vehemently they were indeed interpreting the Bible correctly. In fact, they would say that their interpretation was the only correct interpretation and other churches were wrong. Why would this be? Because all these groups would be looking at the Scripture though the veil of their modern prophet, or the teachings of their organization. It is my settled conclusion that the same thing holds true in Adventism." (my emphasis)
Dale Ratzlaff
http://www.ellenwhite.org/mystory2.htm

I must assume that Harold is not permitted to read anything other than SDA literature, books, etc. He had the audacity to say the writings of J. C. Ryle was fiction.

Mary
 

 

 

 

 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#60 of 90

     Posted 7/27/07 7:28 AM   
ozspen
 
From  ozspen  Posts 4967  Last 4:57 AM
To  Harold      [Msg # 117184.60 Message 117184.60 replying to 117184.58 117184.58 ]    
Harold,
>>I don't know why I have to keep saying this, I do not read
fiction. If you want to know what SDAs believe, ask an SDA. If
you want to know what some nuts think, ask them, as I see you
have. <<
When you engage in the use of ad hominem logical fallacies, we can't have a logical discussion. 

These ex-SDAs saw your SDA false doctrine, as my dear friend did.  He is not a nut.  He's a thinking evangelical Christian who read the Bible without SDA stained glasses.

Sincerely,
Spencer
 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#61 of 90

     Posted 7/27/07 7:34 AM   
ozspen
 
From  ozspen  Posts 4967  Last 4:57 AM
To  Abideth      [Msg # 117184.61 Message 117184.61 replying to 117184.59 117184.59 ]    
Mary,

Thank you for your encouragement and support of sound doctrine and exposure of the SDA false doctrine by another writer:
>>Because all these groups would be looking at the Scripture though the veil of their modern prophet, or the teachings of their organization. It is my settled conclusion that the same thing holds true in Adventism." (my emphasis)
Dale Ratzlaff
http://www.ellenwhite.org/mystory2.htm

I must assume that Harold is not permitted to read anything other than SDA literature, books, etc. He had the audacity to say the writings of J. C. Ryle was fiction.<<

J.C. Ryle is one of the most godly writers I have on my bookshelves.  God used him to promote orthodox Christianity a century ago.  It does not surprise me that Harold would consider J. C. Ryle's writings to be fiction when he considers Ellen White's Investigative Judgment to be Christian.

However, interacting with Harold on most occasions is like talking to a brick wall.  The cult thinking has overcome him.

I praise the Lord for the many ex-SDAs who now have a presence on the www and are exposing SDA false teaching.

In Christ,
Spencer

 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#62 of 90

     Posted 7/27/07 8:28 AM   
Harold
 
From  Harold  Posts 10535  Last 2:18 PM
To  ozspen      [Msg # 117184.62 Message 117184.62 replying to 117184.60 117184.60 ]    

>>These ex-SDAs saw your SDA false doctrine, as my dear friend
did. He is not a nut. He's a thinking evangelical Christian
who read the Bible without SDA stained glasses.>>

You really disappoint me. All those texts, and you didn't even
read them. Now I know why you think any other church is wrong.
Go on and stick to your traditions, but leave the Bible alone, as
it will show you up. Go on and attack what you refuse to
understand. I notice, too, that you didn't tell me what church
you attend.

Harold.

 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#63 of 90

     Posted 7/27/07 5:24 PM   
ozspen
 
From  ozspen  Posts 4967  Last 4:57 AM
To  Harold      [Msg # 117184.63 Message 117184.63 replying to 117184.62 117184.62 ]    
Harold,

Your intentions are good, but your response is dead wrong when you made this statement:

<<You really disappoint me. All those texts, and you didn't evenread them. Now I know why you think any other church is wrong.>>
You don't sit in my house or at my computer.  You were not in my presence and yet you have the audacity to make the statement that I <<didn't evenread them>>, referring to the biblical texts.  You were dead wrong.  I read all of them but I disagree with your interpretation and I have debated this with you previously.  I'm not going over the same ground again.

So <<I know why you think any other church is wrong>>.  No you don't, Harold, because you don't seem to understand my deep commitment to the inerrant Word of God and my pursuit of historical-grammatical-cultural interpretation.  Because I conclude differently to you, you have to falsely label me: >>leave the Bible alone, as it will show you up. Go on and attack what you refuse to understand.<<

The fact is that I love the Bible, spend hours in any week on Bible study, but I come to different conclusions to you.

Please show me where I have attacked you personally.  Please show me.

Sincerely,
Spencer
 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#64 of 90

     Posted 7/27/07 6:08 PM   
Harold
 
From  Harold  Posts 10535  Last 2:18 PM
To  ozspen      [Msg # 117184.64 Message 117184.64 replying to 117184.63 117184.63 ]    

>> I read all of them but I disagree with your interpretation
and I have debated this with you previously.>>

Well, There you are. I didn't interpret any of those. They are
copied and pasted right from my KJV.

You are still carrying on Satan's preaching about the immortality
of the soul. That is what he told Eve. "You shall not surely die."
That is exactly opposite what God had told her. Now. Somebody
in there is lying. It is either God or Satan. Who do you bet on?

"The soul that sinneth shall die". I didn't say that. The Bible
did. How do you interpret that any differently than that the soul
that sins will die?

"At the last trump, we put on our immortality". I didn't say that,
the Bible did. How do you interpret that?

"God formed man out of the dust of the earth and breathed into him
the breath of life and man became a living soul." No where does
it say that God gave man a soul. Two parts. Dust and breath.
I didn't say that, the Bible did. How do you interpret that?

God forbade anyone to mess around with spiritualism simply
because He knew what would come of it. People talking to the
dead. Dead people can't talk to you, so who is? Think about
that.

I have said this over and over. Read John 3:16. Point out the
ones who have eternal life and the ones that DON'T. Do the
same with Romans 6:23. Some have eternal life and some DON'T.
Can you possibly see that? I didn't say that, the Bible did.

Harold.

 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#65 of 90

     Posted 7/27/07 6:26 PM   
ozspen
 
From  ozspen  Posts 4967  Last 4:57 AM
To  Harold      [Msg # 117184.65 Message 117184.65 replying to 117184.64 117184.64 ]    
Harold,

When have I personally attacked you?  You still haven't told me.
>>You are still carrying on Satan's preaching about the immortalityof the soul. . ."The soul that sinneth shall die". I didn't say that. The Bibledid. How do you interpret that any differently than that the soul that sins will die?<<
There are many refutations of your false doctrine about the mortality of the soul and soul sleep.  This is just one of them: http://www.bible.ca/d-death=sleep.htm

You don't seem to understand that death means separation of the body from the soul/spirit.  As Eccl. 12:7 confirms what happens at death, "And the dust returns to the earth as it was, and the spirit returns to God."

I am not the tool of any Satanic conspiracy, but am presenting a view of the intermediate state that is a foundation of orthodox Christianity.  It is your teaching that is the abberation.

Sincerely,
Spencer
 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#66 of 90

     Posted 7/27/07 10:54 PM   
restonthe7thday
 
From  restonthe7thday  Posts 296  Last 9/3/08
To  ozspen      [Msg # 117184.66 Message 117184.66 replying to 117184.55 117184.55 ]    

Sincerely,
Spencer

Here is a parable a short story designed to convey truth. See If you can pick up on the meaning!

"There was once a man who made little artaficialy inteligent robots. These robots had a computer chip implanted in their little robot brains with instructions on how to get along with each other, the world around them and their designer and maker. The man made these little robots to be truly artificialy inteligent. so he gave them tha ability to take out their own chips if they so choose.

The very first two robots made the poor judgement call of removing that very important geting along with everything around them chip. and were now stuck making very poor choices. Eventualy these poor little robots would self distruct because of all the poor choices that they would make. So the man who made them felt bad and he decided to fix them. He knew however that if he tried to fix them by just placing a new get along with everything chip they would inevatibly take it out again. So he did the best thing possible for them.

He placed all his knowledge inside the mind of a little robot just like them. Through this liittle robot the other robots would learn how to make good choices. But that ws not enough the robots didn't have anything in their little robot minds to accept the instructions of the man who made them so the man did something else for the robots.

He placed all the chips the robots would need inside the special little robot he sent that had all the mans knowledge. The special robot would invite the other robots to take a special chip from him and those that did he gave them one.

When some of the robots started taking the chips the ones who didn't got jelous and made their own chips some simmilar and some very diffrent from the mans original chip. But all of them claimed one thing and that is that their chip was the best and original from the man who made them.

So confusion set in! How were the little robots to know which chip was the original one's from the man who made them? Simple said the special little robot! If the chip you have does not contain all the original instruction the man gave you before you removed your original chips then those are the bad chips?

Which chips do you have?

 

 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#67 of 90

     Posted 7/27/07 11:21 PM   
Janet
 
From  Janet  Posts 5836  Last 2/12/09
To  restonthe7thday      [Msg # 117184.67 Message 117184.67 replying to 117184.66 117184.66 ]    
>>Here is a parable a short story designed to convey truth.<<

Keep your day job.

Janet

 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#68 of 90

     Posted 7/27/07 11:41 PM   
restonthe7thday
 
From  restonthe7thday  Posts 296  Last 9/3/08
To  Janet      [Msg # 117184.68 Message 117184.68 replying to 117184.67 117184.67 ]    

>>Keep your day job.<<

Is that all you could come up with?

No comments on the erant ideas proclaimed in my little story!

Since I've been posting on this very animated thread "What is an SDA?" there has been a single thread of thought I have tried to convey: Worship the Creator! A thought  which every non sda has responded to by saying: No we don't have too!

If you doubt the truth of my words then ask yourself? If not by the sabbath then how do I know what god I pray to every week?

You may say I worship Jesus! But your Jesus teaches to break a direct command of God! So who is it that you pray too?

This is a general statement made in the spirit of reflection on truth! Don't get mad! Just think of that logic for a bit! That goes for everyone else reading these words! Think for a bit on that logic before getting mad!

 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#69 of 90

     Posted 7/28/07 1:13 AM   
Janet
 
From  Janet  Posts 5836  Last 2/12/09
To  restonthe7thday      [Msg # 117184.69 Message 117184.69 replying to 117184.68 117184.68 ]    
>>No comments on the erant ideas proclaimed in my little story!<<

I have  no idea what "erant" means, unless you have misspelled the word "errant," in which case you have chosen an apt word:  deviating from the proper course; erring.

>>
there has been a single thread of thought I have tried to convey: Worship the Creator! A thought  which every non sda has responded to by saying: No we don't have too!<<

I read every post that passes through this place, and I can state with confidence that you are either lying through your teeth or you have some sort of reading disability or possibly an arterial flow problem, because the only non-SDA person in here who says he doesn't have to worship the Creator is dontom the atheist. 

Since you have learned to copy and paste, I know that if there is such a statement anywhere in the previous posts, you will find it and re-post it for us.

>>
If not by the sabbath then how do I know what god I pray to every week?<<

Here's a hint:  Pay attention to the first word or words in your prayer.  Does it start out "Dear God" or "Heavenly Father" or "Dear Lord" or something similar?  If so, well, there's your clue.

>>
But your Jesus teaches to break a direct command of God! So who is it that you pray too?<<

You SDAers are such one-trick ponies.  I pray to the Father.

Janet


 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#70 of 90

     Posted 7/28/07 8:07 AM   
Harold
 
From  Harold  Posts 10535  Last 2:18 PM
To  ozspen      [Msg # 117184.70 Message 117184.70 replying to 117184.65 117184.65 ]    

>>"And the dust returns to the earth as it was, and the spirit returns to God."<<

You still haven't given your explaination of "the soul that sinneth, it shall die."

I know that is a hard one for someone who thinks he has an immortal soul. It is a shame that person doesn't read his Bible and see what it says about immortality.

That text you sent, you only sent part of it. Here is all of it.

7  Then shall the dust return to the earth as it was: and the spirit shall return unto God who gave it.

Now, go back and look at Genesis 2:7.  What did God give?  My Bible says 'breath'. Now, look up that word 'spirit' in your Strong's concordance. Here, I will do it for you:

ruòach

roo'-akh

From H7306; wind; by resemblance breath, that is, a sensible (or even
violent) exhalation; figuratively life, anger, unsubstantiality; by extension a
region of the sky; by resemblance spirit, but only of a rational being (including
its expression and functions):—air, anger, blast, breath, X cool, courage, mind, X
quarter, X side, spirit ([-ual]), tempest, X vain, ([whirl-]) wind (-y).

Isn't that amazing. It says 'breath', too. 

I suppose, though, that I don't know how to interpret that, either.

You keep preaching that God gave you your immortality already.  Keep preaching that your 'soul' is immortal.  Satan did that, already, so just keep it up.

Harold

 OptionsReply to this Message Reply
 Subscribe SubscribeGet a printer-friendly version of this discussion Print Discussion 
Contentious Brethren

More about Seventh Day Adventists

  
 
     

Welcome, Guest

  • Post a message
  • New messages to you
  • Log in

Start Search
Advanced Search

Prospero Blocks
 
 
 
Special Offers
 
 
 

Cool Clicks!

 
 
 

Finding People

 
 
 
© 2009 CompuServe Interactive Services, Inc. All rights reserved.

Legal Notices | Privacy Policy