Exactly the same thing it tells you. "For by grace are ye savedthrough faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God.."But, have you bothered to read anything else in your Bible? Evenverse 5 "Even when we were dead in sins, hath quickened us together with Christ, (by grace ye are saved;)"How could you be dead in sins? What is sin????? What about all thesetexts:????1 John 2:3 "And hereby we do know that we know him, if wekeep his commandments. 4 He that saith, I know him, andkeepeth not his commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him. 5 But whoso keepeth his word, in him verilyis the love of God perfected: hereby know we that we are in him."Romans 6:16 "Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselvesservants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?"
Wow... Harold.. if you would just step back and look at your interpretations of these passages..
How does someone who is 'dead IN sin' make themselves alive? By being obedient to the law which is impossible for them to complete, nor even having an inclanation to try and complete it? NO!.. God quickens us together with Christ. Quicken means to make alive - something that we could not do for ourselves, which is why salvation is not by works but all of grace. Read this clearly - Man is incapable of completing the law... even when you were infused with the Holy Spirit, you still struggle with flesh... you may not openly break the law in action, but you still may do so in thoughts and intentions (even sometimes sinning in ignorance). So what happens when you are made alive in Christ -
1.) First you see the grossness of sin
2.) You see the holiness of God (thereby making you extremely humble)
3.) You see the gospel of Jesus Christ as personal and finally understand what His death and resuurection mean
4.) You have faith in that gospel (which is a gift also from God) and this completes your justification in His heavenly courts.
5.) You live your life by Him, for Him, and with Him. All in love... (Here is where works come in)
6.) You grow in grace and in the knowledge of Christ ...
John specifically says, that if we do what Christ says, 'thereby we know we are in Him', not 'thereby he saves us'...
>>fulfil<<
Please fill in the blanks!
Jesus said: "Think not that I come to________the law and the prophets. I am not come to___________,but to___________ Mathew 5:17
Is there not a clear distinction of meaning here between the two word?
>>Please fill in the blanks! Jesus said: "Think not that I come to________the law and the prophets. I am not come to___________,but to___________ Mathew 5:17<<
Jesus said: "Think not that I come to________the law and the prophets. I am not come to___________,but to___________ Mathew 5:17<<
Sincerely,Spencer
>>I have about 12 different English Bible translations on my shelf.<<
Pretty confident huh? yet a simple change,change & fulfil is beyond you!
I know! I know from your vantage point I am the evil, legalistic, judizing, sunday stomping catholic hating, try to work my way into heaven,poor excuse of a christian, sda!
I know that you see me as the enemy and so your fighting gloves are on!
But if you just took your blinders off you would see what I see!
Revelation says,"...and all the world wondered after the beast!" rev. 13:3
There is only one religion that holds that kind of power and has consistantly held it for the past +1000 years. compare your doctrines with those of the whole bible and see how they stack up! Popular christianity is not the religion of christ!
<<I know! I know from your vantage point I am the evil, legalistic, judizing, sunday stomping catholic hating, try to work my way into heaven,poor excuse of a christian, sda!>>
This is a false statement. I do not know you apart from your posts and I have never ever on this forum many this kind of statement towards you. Never!
>>I know that you see me as the enemy and so your fighting gloves are on!>>
Please give up the persecution complex. I most certainly do not regard you as an enemy whom I am fighting with "fighting gloves" (whatever that means). I see you as promoting false doctrine, based on the Bible, and I am trying to have a Bible discussion with you.
>>But if you just took your blinders off you would see what I see! Revelation says,"...and all the world wondered after the beast!" rev. 13:3<<
So do you regard me as a follower of the beast of Rev. 13:3?
>>There is only one religion that holds that kind of power and has consistantly held it for the past +1000 years. compare your doctrines with those of the whole bible and see how they stack up! Popular christianity is not the religion of christ!<<
I'm a Bible-believing, evangelical Christian who accepts the Bible as the inerrant Word of God. I only debate with you based on my understanding of the Bible that is without error in the original manuscripts.
Would you please quit making false allegations about my faith and me?
>> I see you as promoting false doctrine, based on the Bible, >>
Sorry to step in, but this statement just cound't be passed.What 'false' doctrine' do we promote, based on the Bible? I didn'tknow that there could be any such thing. All of our doctrines arebased on the Bible. I am sorry to say that this is more than youcan say about all of your doctrines. I'll name two.The immortality of the soulThe sacredness of Sunday.Try as you might, you can not find any support for either of thosein any Bible.
Harold.
Harold,
>>What 'false' doctrine' do we promote, based on the Bible? I didn't know that there could be any such thing. All of our doctrines are based on the Bible. I am sorry to say that this is more than you can say about all of your doctrines. I'll name two. The immortality of the soul The sacredness of Sunday. Try as you might, you can not find any support for either of those in any Bible.<<
You and your denomination, like the Jehovah's Witnesses, promote false doctrine based on your interpretation of the Bible (hence my description of your false doctrine "based on the Bible"). That's a fact that these ex-Seventh Day Adventists discovered and have provided teaching on the www that refutes your false doctrines.
2. The State of the Dead. In this article from The Watchman Expositor, there is a refutation of your false doctrine of soul sleep, in which it is rightly declared: "Adventists, like Jehovah Witnesses, believe in soul sleep and do not believe in hell. Note how they have changed the word of God to fit their theology."
Etc., etc.
I don't know why I have to keep saying this, I do not readfiction. If you want to know what SDAs believe, ask an SDA. Ifyou want to know what some nuts think, ask them, as I see youhave. Anyone can twist scripture. And you know what He says isgoing to happen to anyone who does.
I thought you were smarter than that. What church do you belongto? Do you doubt that I can find some nuts on this internet thathave lots to say about your church??? Should I believe them???So, why do you ask the nuts about MY church?? Instesd, why don'tyou look up our doctrines in the Bible. That is where they comefrom.Let's start with the immortality of the soul.l. Gen.2:7 "And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul."
Two elements. Dust and breath. Nobody gave Adam a soul. Hejust simply became one.
Ezek. 18:4 "Behold, all souls are mine; as the soul of the father, so also the soul of the son is mine: the soul that sinneth, it shall die."
So much for that immortal soul.
1 Cor.15:52 "In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed. 53 For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality."
Aha. At the LAST TRUMP. Now we get our immortality.
Does any of this get through, or is the filter of the RCC toostrong?
You and your denomination, like the Jehovah's Witnesses, promote false doctrine based on your interpretation of the Bible (hence my description of your false doctrine "based on the Bible"). That's a fact that these ex-Seventh Day Adventists discovered and have provided teaching on the www that refutes your false doctrines. <<<<
Hi Spencer, Here is a excerpt from an article written by Dale Ratzlaff, a former SDA who refutes the Investigative Judgment. This certainly supports your comment on the false doctrines of the SDA and others as you will see in the following:"Since leaving Adventism I have made two profound conclusions. Some readers may find these very offensive, but I believe they are nevertheless patently true and are of utmost importance, and that is why I share them here:One cannot understand the Bible correctly when continuing to read the writings of Ellen White. While an Adventist I would have reacted passionately to this statement as some readers may now be doing! The concept is more easily acceptable, however, if applied to other religious groups. No Mormon will be able to understand the Bible correctly while continuing to read Joseph Smith’s The Pearl of Great Price and Doctrine and Covenants. No member of the Christian Science Church will be able to understand the Bible correctly while continuing to read Mary Baker Eddy’s Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures. No Jehovah’s Witness will understand the Bible correctly while continuing to read the Watchtower. All these groups would argue vehemently they were indeed interpreting the Bible correctly. In fact, they would say that their interpretation was the only correct interpretation and other churches were wrong. Why would this be? Because all these groups would be looking at the Scripture though the veil of their modern prophet, or the teachings of their organization. It is my settled conclusion that the same thing holds true in Adventism." (my emphasis)Dale Ratzlaffhttp://www.ellenwhite.org/mystory2.htm
I must assume that Harold is not permitted to read anything other than SDA literature, books, etc. He had the audacity to say the writings of J. C. Ryle was fiction.
Mary
>>I don't know why I have to keep saying this, I do not readfiction. If you want to know what SDAs believe, ask an SDA. Ifyou want to know what some nuts think, ask them, as I see youhave. <<
>>Because all these groups would be looking at the Scripture though the veil of their modern prophet, or the teachings of their organization. It is my settled conclusion that the same thing holds true in Adventism." (my emphasis)Dale Ratzlaffhttp://www.ellenwhite.org/mystory2.htm I must assume that Harold is not permitted to read anything other than SDA literature, books, etc. He had the audacity to say the writings of J. C. Ryle was fiction.<<
I must assume that Harold is not permitted to read anything other than SDA literature, books, etc. He had the audacity to say the writings of J. C. Ryle was fiction.<<
J.C. Ryle is one of the most godly writers I have on my bookshelves. God used him to promote orthodox Christianity a century ago. It does not surprise me that Harold would consider J. C. Ryle's writings to be fiction when he considers Ellen White's Investigative Judgment to be Christian.
However, interacting with Harold on most occasions is like talking to a brick wall. The cult thinking has overcome him.
I praise the Lord for the many ex-SDAs who now have a presence on the www and are exposing SDA false teaching.
In Christ,Spencer
>>These ex-SDAs saw your SDA false doctrine, as my dear friend did. He is not a nut. He's a thinking evangelical Christian who read the Bible without SDA stained glasses.>>
You really disappoint me. All those texts, and you didn't evenread them. Now I know why you think any other church is wrong.Go on and stick to your traditions, but leave the Bible alone, asit will show you up. Go on and attack what you refuse to understand. I notice, too, that you didn't tell me what churchyou attend.
<<You really disappoint me. All those texts, and you didn't evenread them. Now I know why you think any other church is wrong.>>
>> I read all of them but I disagree with your interpretation and I have debated this with you previously.>>
Well, There you are. I didn't interpret any of those. They arecopied and pasted right from my KJV.
You are still carrying on Satan's preaching about the immortalityof the soul. That is what he told Eve. "You shall not surely die."That is exactly opposite what God had told her. Now. Somebodyin there is lying. It is either God or Satan. Who do you bet on?
"The soul that sinneth shall die". I didn't say that. The Bibledid. How do you interpret that any differently than that the soulthat sins will die?
"At the last trump, we put on our immortality". I didn't say that,the Bible did. How do you interpret that?
"God formed man out of the dust of the earth and breathed into himthe breath of life and man became a living soul." No where doesit say that God gave man a soul. Two parts. Dust and breath.I didn't say that, the Bible did. How do you interpret that?
God forbade anyone to mess around with spiritualism simply because He knew what would come of it. People talking to thedead. Dead people can't talk to you, so who is? Think aboutthat.
I have said this over and over. Read John 3:16. Point out theones who have eternal life and the ones that DON'T. Do thesame with Romans 6:23. Some have eternal life and some DON'T.Can you possibly see that? I didn't say that, the Bible did.
>>You are still carrying on Satan's preaching about the immortalityof the soul. . ."The soul that sinneth shall die". I didn't say that. The Bibledid. How do you interpret that any differently than that the soul that sins will die?<<
Here is a parable a short story designed to convey truth. See If you can pick up on the meaning!
"There was once a man who made little artaficialy inteligent robots. These robots had a computer chip implanted in their little robot brains with instructions on how to get along with each other, the world around them and their designer and maker. The man made these little robots to be truly artificialy inteligent. so he gave them tha ability to take out their own chips if they so choose.
The very first two robots made the poor judgement call of removing that very important geting along with everything around them chip. and were now stuck making very poor choices. Eventualy these poor little robots would self distruct because of all the poor choices that they would make. So the man who made them felt bad and he decided to fix them. He knew however that if he tried to fix them by just placing a new get along with everything chip they would inevatibly take it out again. So he did the best thing possible for them.
He placed all his knowledge inside the mind of a little robot just like them. Through this liittle robot the other robots would learn how to make good choices. But that ws not enough the robots didn't have anything in their little robot minds to accept the instructions of the man who made them so the man did something else for the robots.
He placed all the chips the robots would need inside the special little robot he sent that had all the mans knowledge. The special robot would invite the other robots to take a special chip from him and those that did he gave them one.
When some of the robots started taking the chips the ones who didn't got jelous and made their own chips some simmilar and some very diffrent from the mans original chip. But all of them claimed one thing and that is that their chip was the best and original from the man who made them.
So confusion set in! How were the little robots to know which chip was the original one's from the man who made them? Simple said the special little robot! If the chip you have does not contain all the original instruction the man gave you before you removed your original chips then those are the bad chips?
Which chips do you have?
>>Keep your day job.<<
Is that all you could come up with?
No comments on the erant ideas proclaimed in my little story!
Since I've been posting on this very animated thread "What is an SDA?" there has been a single thread of thought I have tried to convey: Worship the Creator! A thought which every non sda has responded to by saying: No we don't have too!
If you doubt the truth of my words then ask yourself? If not by the sabbath then how do I know what god I pray to every week?
You may say I worship Jesus! But your Jesus teaches to break a direct command of God! So who is it that you pray too?
This is a general statement made in the spirit of reflection on truth! Don't get mad! Just think of that logic for a bit! That goes for everyone else reading these words! Think for a bit on that logic before getting mad!
>>"And the dust returns to the earth as it was, and the spirit returns to God."<<You still haven't given your explaination of "the soul that sinneth, it shall die."
I know that is a hard one for someone who thinks he has an immortal soul. It is a shame that person doesn't read his Bible and see what it says about immortality.
7 Then shall the dust return to the earth as it was: and the spirit shall return unto God who gave it.
Now, go back and look at Genesis 2:7. What did God give? My Bible says 'breath'. Now, look up that word 'spirit' in your Strong's concordance. Here, I will do it for you:
From H7306; wind; by resemblance breath, that is, a sensible (or even violent) exhalation; figuratively life, anger, unsubstantiality; by extension a region of the sky; by resemblance spirit, but only of a rational being (including its expression and functions):—air, anger, blast, breath, X cool, courage, mind, X quarter, X side, spirit ([-ual]), tempest, X vain, ([whirl-]) wind (-y).
Isn't that amazing. It says 'breath', too.
I suppose, though, that I don't know how to interpret that, either.
You keep preaching that God gave you your immortality already. Keep preaching that your 'soul' is immortal. Satan did that, already, so just keep it up.
Harold