Jim-->>If the information from the Urban Institute is a 'lie', I'm sure you can explain, in detail, how it is a 'lie' because everyone should have the option to see how you come to your conclusion.
Pay attention to detail and you will not lie about what I wrote. What I said was that the simple mathematics used is not correct. One can not take the national statistical information of a 16 year old study and apply it to a individual district in the here and now. If a Republican tried doing such a thing, you would be charging the Republican with using fuzzy math!!!!
By the way, what did you think of the authors assumption on the living???
|