Photography

     Go!
Prospero Blocks


 

Chat Center

Mark's PhotoTalk - Mon. 10 p.m. ET
Topic: CLOSED TIL FALL

Board Folders

Photo News & Issues: 7079 msgs in 615 dscns, Latest: Nov-17 Photo News ...
7079 msgs in 615 dscns
Latest: Nov-17
Beginner's Corner: 1933 msgs in 144 dscns, Latest: Nov-13 Beginner's Corner
1933 msgs in 144 dscns
Latest: Nov-13
Film Cameras / Gear: 2289 msgs in 157 dscns, Latest: Nov-13 Film Cameras /...
2289 msgs in 157 dscns
Latest: Nov-13
ShutterReview (uploads): 8952 msgs in 789 dscns, Latest: 2:39 PMShutterReview ...
8952 msgs in 789 dscns
Latest: 2:39 PM
Shooting Techniques: 2842 msgs in 157 dscns, Latest: Nov-13 Shooting Techn...
2842 msgs in 157 dscns
Latest: Nov-13
Photo Software/Computer: 9943 msgs in 551 dscns, Latest: Nov-13 Photo Software...
9943 msgs in 551 dscns
Latest: Nov-13
Digital Cameras: 6971 msgs in 437 dscns, Latest: 8:24 PMDigital Cameras
6971 msgs in 437 dscns
Latest: 8:24 PM
Travel & Locations: 6816 msgs in 383 dscns, Latest: Nov-16 Travel & Locat...
6816 msgs in 383 dscns
Latest: Nov-16
After Hours: 12168 msgs in 600 dscns, Latest: Nov-14 After Hours
12168 msgs in 600 dscns
Latest: Nov-14
Digital Imaging (Misc): 5088 msgs in 325 dscns, Latest: 12:18 PMDigital Imagin...
5088 msgs in 325 dscns
Latest: 12:18 PM
Digital Printing: 2696 msgs in 172 dscns, Latest: Oct-26 Digital Printing
2696 msgs in 172 dscns
Latest: Oct-26
$$$ Photo Business $$$: 1342 msgs in 69 dscns, Latest: Nov-13 $$$ Photo Busi...
1342 msgs in 69 dscns
Latest: Nov-13
Other Photo Topics: 4278 msgs in 363 dscns, Latest: 10:13 PMOther Photo To...
4278 msgs in 363 dscns
Latest: 10:13 PM
Post-Processing / Retouching: 2861 msgs in 65 dscns, Latest: 10:46 PMPost-Processin...
2861 msgs in 65 dscns
Latest: 10:46 PM
Message Area
Post-Processing / Retouching

What to Do Next?

 Subscribe SubscribeCreate Poll Create PollGet a printer-friendly version of this discussion Print Discussion 

#1 of 179

     Posted Oct-28 8:58 AM   
Nancy Crays
 
From  Nancy Crays  Posts 658  Last 6:47 AM
To  All      [Msg # 34892.1 ]    
I found a photo of my great grandmother when she was 92 years old.  I put it in the pile of photos to toss, because as a note on the back said my aunt had let light into the camera.  However, the more I looked at it, the more I decided to try to salvage her head which occupies about 1.25 sq. in. of the photo.

I've been working on it off and on for about a week and believe it or not, it looks a lot better than the original.  I need to work on repairing the spots and scratches, most of which are not even visible on the original, but before I do, I'd like to know if you would suggest that I make some more global changes or local changes before working on the spots and scratches.  I've attached what I've done so far - downsized to a jpg.



Nancy C.
Seniors Community
Investing for Growth Forum


Attachments
Name:   Mary_Elizabeth_Herndon_1944_small.jpgSize:   364 K
 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#2 of 179

     Posted Oct-28 11:31 AM   
Cristen
 
From  Cristen  Posts 2297  Last 9:28 AM
To  Nancy Crays      [Msg # 34892.2 Message 34892.2 replying to 34892.1 34892.1 ]    
She's in pretty good shape, actually. I'm sure everyone has their preferences in the order they work in. At this point, I'd probably do what I could to heal the bigger scratches so I'd have less distraction with further tonal corrections, recognizing that if I do more tonal corrections, I might make more of the scratches stand out.

You may be near the point where you can get away with nudging the Brightness slider on its adjustment layer to soften and lighten her up a little, use one of the blurs judiciously to smooth out some of the garbage and her skin, and then just go for the eyes. You may need to paint a catchlight in, but whatever, you want to find some light in the eyes to bring out.

You can leave a lot of damage around her without restoring it to "new-ness." People accept it -- it makes the photo authentically old. You might want to even softly vignette the photo to fade out the detail that doesn't contribute anything, and places more emphasis on her face and the detail in her gown. If you go for a somewhat low-contrast, high key look, you minimize our awareness of the damage, and it can suit the subject nicely. I'm guessing, of course. You'd have to try it to see if you liked it.

But she's highly visible, so you've already done a good job there, and  I think it's a nice picture of her. Restoring it enough to see her more clearly is going to be worth it, I think.

Cristen
 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#3 of 179

     Posted Oct-28 2:01 PM   
Nancy Crays
 
From  Nancy Crays  Posts 658  Last 6:47 AM
To  Cristen      [Msg # 34892.3 Message 34892.3 replying to 34892.2 34892.2 ]    
Thanks for all the tips.  I thought I'd try the vignette first.  I tried the method in Eismann's book and kept trying different amounts of Gaussian blur on the fill layer selection.  This is a little over 50%.

It bothers me a bit that she is not in the center of the circle, but I rather like her being to the right and hate to crop more on the left to achieve that.  (rule of thirds? <G>)

What do you think?  Does it look better or worse with the vignette?  Should I change the size, color or amount of blurring?

Nancy C.
Seniors Community
Investing for Growth Forum


Attachments
Name:   Mary_Elizabeth_Herndon_edited_ACR_vignette.jpgSize:   294 K
 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#4 of 179

     Posted Oct-28 4:14 PM   
dorothyb222
 
From  dorothyb222  Posts 1079  Last 8:44 PM
To  Nancy Crays      [Msg # 34892.4 Message 34892.4 replying to 34892.3 34892.3 ]    

Nancy -

Can you make the vignette border somewhat narrower? Your grandmother's hair seems to be obscured by the width of the vignette on the right side.

Dorothy

 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#5 of 179

     Posted Oct-28 5:23 PM   
Nancy Crays
 
From  Nancy Crays  Posts 658  Last 6:47 AM
To  dorothyb222      [Msg # 34892.5 Message 34892.5 replying to 34892.4 34892.4 ]    
As best as I can figure out, as I narrow the vignette with Gaussian blur below 50, it becomes harder and I don't like the hard look.  I'm thinking it might be better not to use a vignette.  However, Cristen or someone else may tell me there is a better way to do it.

I would love to have not cropped the photo so tightly, but much of it is completely white or almost so.

Nancy C.
Seniors Community
Investing for Growth Forum

 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#6 of 179

     Posted Oct-28 8:19 PM   
Cristen
 
From  Cristen  Posts 2297  Last 9:28 AM
To  Nancy Crays      [Msg # 34892.6 Message 34892.6 replying to 34892.3 34892.3 ]    
> It bothers me a bit that she is not in the center of the circle, but I rather like her being to the right and hate to crop more on the left to achieve that.  (rule of thirds? <G>)

I wouldn't make it a circle, and I wouldn't get rid of any of the photo in the process. I'd make a rectangular selection, heavily feathered, and quite wide, and I'd reduce the opacity of the white fill. I'd want the picture to fade out towards the edges. To fade gently, I'd probably extend the canvas all around at first, so I'd have more control. I could crop in later, but I'd still take almost all of the photo in.

What you're aiming for, in my imagination, is a replication of the damaged lower right all around the edges, perhaps just slightly heavier fading, taking in enough of the outside edges that focus is moved inward, but without eliminating the environment altogether. You just want a general softening of the edges, which is both a sign of "old photo," and flattering to a portrait of an old person, since it softens contrast overall.

Another typical way to achieve this is to create an oval that extends beyond the edge, so the heavy feather comes partially inside the image, but more in the corners than top/bottom.

Nik is particularly good at help you create nice vignettes, but I don't think you want to rush out and spend $200 to do this<G>

Cristen
 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#7 of 179

     Posted Oct-29 6:51 AM   
Nancy Crays
 
From  Nancy Crays  Posts 658  Last 6:47 AM
To  Cristen      [Msg # 34892.7 Message 34892.7 replying to 34892.6 34892.6 ]    
I hadn't thought of extending the canvas for this.  That's a good tip.

Attached is my second attempt at a vignette.  I feathered 100 pixels.  Should it be more?  I extended the canvas and drew the rectangular marquis to the edge of the photo.

I tried various levels of opacity.  This is 90.  If I went lower, it didn't seem to do much on the left.

Nik and Topaz both make good plugins and I may buy some from them, but I probably wouldn't spend $200 for one that makes vignettes.  I might spend it for the one Dorothy saw at the photo show in NY.

Nancy C.
Seniors Community
Investing for Growth Forum

 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#8 of 179

     Posted Oct-29 7:00 AM   
Nancy Crays
 
From  Nancy Crays  Posts 658  Last 6:47 AM
To  Cristen      [Msg # 34892.8 Message 34892.8 replying to 34892.2 34892.2 ]    
use one of the blurs judiciously to smooth out some of the garbage and her skin,

Do you mean using the blur tool?  Or do you mean using the spot healing and healing brush tools?

Nancy C.
Seniors Community
Investing for Growth Forum

 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#9 of 179

     Posted Oct-29 8:19 AM   
Ron Wrucke-VA Eastern Shore
 
From  Ron Wrucke-VA Eastern Shore  Posts 770  Last 4:11 PM
To  Nancy Crays      [Msg # 34892.9 Message 34892.9 replying to 34892.3 34892.3 ]    
<<I tried the method in Eismann's book and kept trying different amounts of Gaussian blur on the fill layer selection.>>

... if there is a hard way to do things, you seem to find it ... <g>

In P'shop (don't know about PSE?),
  • Filter | Render | Lighting Effects
  • Select Style = Soft Omni
  • Adjust center of spot and extent of effect (experiment; you'll get a feel for it)
  • Click OK
  • Click Edit | Fade Lighting Effects
  • Change Mode to Darken (the center of the spot will remain "as-was" before the effect was applied, the edges will darken)
  • Adjust Opacity
  • ... an easy way to apply a black vignette
For a more adaptable vignette, see the attached:

Ron Wrucke
Eastern Shore Imaging


Attachments
Name:   Vignette_Effect_in_Photoshop.docSize:   22 K
 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#10 of 179

     Posted Oct-29 11:31 AM   
Nancy Crays
 
From  Nancy Crays  Posts 658  Last 6:47 AM
To  Ron Wrucke-VA Eastern Shore      [Msg # 34892.10 Message 34892.10 replying to 34892.9 34892.9 ]    
"Thanks.  Now I have 3 ways to create a vignette.  The one in the Word doc is similar to what I've been doing with Cristen's help.  However, I didn't use a radial gradient fill.  I can't figure out how to make the gradient go from transparent to foreground.  Your directions say, "
...[Message truncated]

Nancy C.
Seniors Community
Investing for Growth Forum

 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#11 of 179

     Posted Oct-29 1:15 PM   
Ron Wrucke-VA Eastern Shore
 
From  Ron Wrucke-VA Eastern Shore  Posts 770  Last 4:11 PM
To  Nancy Crays      [Msg # 34892.11 Message 34892.11 replying to 34892.10 34892.10 ]    
<<Your directions say 'Select the Gradient Fill Tool and click on the box showing the current selection to use the Gradient Editor."  I selected the tool, but I can't find that box.>>

.. see attached ..

Ron Wrucke
Eastern Shore Imaging


Attachments
Name:   GradientFillSelection.jpgSize:   24 K

Edited Oct-29   by  Ron Wrucke-VA Eastern Shore
 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#12 of 179

     Posted Oct-29 1:46 PM   
Nancy Crays
 
From  Nancy Crays  Posts 658  Last 6:47 AM
To  Ron Wrucke-VA Eastern Shore      [Msg # 34892.12 Message 34892.12 replying to 34892.11 34892.11 ]    
Thanks again!

Nancy C.
Seniors Community
Investing for Growth Forum

 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#13 of 179

     Posted Oct-29 5:00 PM   
Cristen
 
From  Cristen  Posts 2297  Last 9:28 AM
To  Nancy Crays      [Msg # 34892.13 Message 34892.13 replying to 34892.7 34892.7 ]    
> I feathered 100 pixels.  Should it be more?

Without seeing I can't say, but you're the best judge. It's right when it looks right<G> Not reducing the opacity by much could be right. You just don't want solid white for more than a few pixels in, if any.

> but I probably wouldn't spend $200 for one that makes vignettes.

You wouldn't be paying just for the vignettes. Both Silver Efex Pro and Color Efex Pro have several vignetting schemes for both light and dark vignettes, different sizes,  shapes, and edges, how opaque, even user selectable colors. You can set the center, so the vignette is off-center, too.

But there's no way to call those plugins cheap, even if they give you loads to use with different images. They're no one-trick pony, but they make darned sure by the price that you're serious about using them. Use up ALL of the demo before buying. That's the only way to know they'll work on a lot of different images and that you truly want what's on offer.

Otherwise, it's cheaper to learn how to do these things in PS<G>

Cristen
 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#14 of 179

     Posted Oct-29 5:34 PM   
Nancy Crays
 
From  Nancy Crays  Posts 658  Last 6:47 AM
To  Cristen      [Msg # 34892.14 Message 34892.14 replying to 34892.13 34892.13 ]    
Without seeing I can't say, but you're the best judge.

I see I didn't attach the photo.  I seem to make a habit of that.  I think this may be the right one. 

Nancy C.
Seniors Community
Investing for Growth Forum


Attachments
Name:   Mary_Elizabeth_Herndon_vignette_small.jpgSize:   332 K
 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#15 of 179

     Posted Oct-30 10:12 AM   
Cristen
 
From  Cristen  Posts 2297  Last 9:28 AM
To  Nancy Crays      [Msg # 34892.15 Message 34892.15 replying to 34892.14 34892.14 ]    
I might want a trifle more on the left side, but without cleaning it up so I can see the contrast, I couldn't say. It's one of those things you can play with after the rest is done. By keeping it on a separate layer, it's non-destructive and can be fiddled with indefinitely. Which, sadly, is about the amount of time I seem to take when I'm fiddling. <G>

Cristen
 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#16 of 179

     Posted Oct-30 11:01 AM   
Nancy Crays
 
From  Nancy Crays  Posts 658  Last 6:47 AM
To  Cristen      [Msg # 34892.16 Message 34892.16 replying to 34892.15 34892.15 ]    
By keeping it on a separate layer, it's non-destructive and can be fiddled with indefinitely. Which, sadly, is about the amount of time I seem to take when I'm fiddling.
I know the feeling.

Unfortunately, I am going to have to start over with this one.  Well, just the vignette stuff.  I managed to try one of the other vignette techniques in the same file not planning to save those.  Then I came back later and did that.  So I have a vignette I don't like in that layer.  I've re-done the vignetting so many times that I now can do it from memory, so it should go fast.

I need to start on the clean up of the spots and scratches on her face.

Maybe I'd get more done if I didn't work on several photos at one time, but spot removal and repair of scratches and cracks is tedious - at least to me - especially on those where the emulsion is breaking down - so I have to get away from repair work periodically. 

Nancy C.
Seniors Community
Investing for Growth Forum

 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#17 of 179

     Posted Oct-30 8:08 PM   
Cristen
 
From  Cristen  Posts 2297  Last 9:28 AM
To  Nancy Crays      [Msg # 34892.17 Message 34892.17 replying to 34892.16 34892.16 ]    
> I've re-done the vignetting so many times that I now can do it from memory, so it should go fast.

That's exactly how I have learned what I have! And managed to forget the rest. <G>

> but spot removal and repair of scratches and cracks is tedious - at least to me

It's too much like housework. I can sometimes get in the mood, but it's easiest if there's something fairly boring on TV at night. I'm not going to do all that much at night anyway, so that seems to be a better time for me. I don't quite feel so much like I'm "burning daylight."

I know some people wouldn't think it was worth the work, but I think it is, and she looks like a lovely soul.

Cristen
 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#18 of 179

     Posted Oct-30 9:13 PM   
Nancy Crays
 
From  Nancy Crays  Posts 658  Last 6:47 AM
To  Cristen      [Msg # 34892.18 Message 34892.18 replying to 34892.17 34892.17 ]    
she looks like a lovely soul.
My mother really loved her and she is the one from whom my mother learned the family history.  My mother's family lived next door to her.  She had dementia most of the time I knew her so she scared me sometimes.  I didn't know whether to believe what she told me or not.  One of her daughters from her first marriage lived with her.  I was at their house one day and she told me she was tired, because Annie had kept her up all night drinking and partying with men.  Another day she screamed out the window that Annie was poisoning her food.  Today, people would probably put her in a nursing home or mental hospital, but in those days everyone just took it in stride.  She was 97 when she died.

I have another photo of her standing in the yard outside her house with flowers in her hands that she sent me when I was a little child.  I haven't really tackled it yet, but I like it.

Nancy C.
Seniors Community
Investing for Growth Forum

 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#19 of 179

     Posted Oct-31 11:41 AM   
Cristen
 
From  Cristen  Posts 2297  Last 9:28 AM
To  Nancy Crays      [Msg # 34892.19 Message 34892.19 replying to 34892.18 34892.18 ]    
> She had dementia most of the time I knew her so she scared me sometimes.

Dementia can be a bit frightening even when you're grown and understand it. If families can afford it, there are some places that are better for the person with dementia than their own home -- they relax and don't have so many triggers. Sadly, there are vastly more places that range from mild neglect to downright abuse of dementia patients. Some treat them well enough physically, but have their places set up to be basically "nursing" homes. Nursing is what people without dementia do, and when you make it convenient for them, instead of for the patient -- well, imagine living 5 or more years in a hospital room. Not very pleasant, is it, and just because you have dementia doesn't mean you haven't any clue of your surroundings.

You know, if she is remembered for having dementia, all the more reason to show her in some way divorced from the fear and rage that often accompanies loss of memory and comprehension. There was more to her than that, and I think it is showing up in that photo.


Cristen
 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#20 of 179

     Posted Oct-31 11:58 AM   
Nancy Crays
 
From  Nancy Crays  Posts 658  Last 6:47 AM
To  Cristen      [Msg # 34892.20 Message 34892.20 replying to 34892.19 34892.19 ]    
There was more to her than that, and I think it is showing up in that photo.


This photo was made in August of 1943 when she was 91 years old, so I think that was before she had dementia.  I can't be sure, as I was only 4 years old then and only have a few memories of that trip.  When I remember her having dementia, was probably when we were there in 1949.

Nancy C.
Seniors Community
Investing for Growth Forum

 OptionsReply to this Message Reply
 Subscribe SubscribeCreate Poll Create PollGet a printer-friendly version of this discussion Print Discussion 
Post-Processing / Retouching

What to Do Next?

  
 
     

Welcome, Guest

  • Post a message
  • New messages to you
  • Log in

Start Search
Advanced Search

Prospero Blocks
 
 
 
Special Offers
 
 
 

Finding People

 
 
 

Cool Clicks!

 
 
 
© 2009 CompuServe Interactive Services, Inc. All rights reserved.

Legal Notices | Privacy Policy